top of page

Leveraging Technology for Distance Learning

By Bettyann Rogers (March 14, 2018)

 

The most effective way to transform face-to-face content, to online content, is to leverage technology to connect learners to a network of other learners, or a learning community (i.e., connecting them to something greater than themselves, which provides them with purpose; Siemens, 2006). Learning (i.e., the transformation of ideals and behaviors) happens when your learners collaborate with others and connects to a network of learning activities (Siemens, 2006; Laureate Education, n.d.). In other words, throughout the program, or course, the learner must be able to identify their learning growth, and then identify that growth with others. Some students will require more structure than others. That is, courses integrating timelines, due-dates, and feedback systems. Whereas, other students will need relevant real-world scenarios incorporated into the course to commit the instructional content to memory for later application (Laureate Education, n.d.).

 

Tools for leveraging

According to Vai and Sosulski (2016), discussion boards, instant messaging, emails, blog posts, interactive score board's/grading charts, and feedback links provides the best means to leverage technology for successful learning transference. Adobe connect, Skype, whiteboards, and Zoom (which promotes group communication/networking via projects, role playing, and polls/surveys) helps transform traditional face-to-face instructional content, into engaging online learner activities and cognition equivalent to that of face-to-face lectures. So, if instructional designers incorporate these tenets with Mayer's (2014) 12 principles for constructing multimedia learning experiences, then the success rate for learning transfer will increase. This is the focal point behind what Dr. Simonson (Laureate Education, n.d.) described as the Equivalency Theory.

 

The theory behind leveraging content

Out of all the various theories, the Equivalency Theory, suggested by Dr. Simonson (Laureate Education, n.d.), states that face-to-face learning is not the same as distance learning. The theory suggests that instructional designers must construct learning modules differently to engage learners and provide contextual outcomes like face-to-face learning. Face-to-face dichotomy should not be mimicked in learning modules (Laureate Education, n.d.). For instance, Mayer (2014) devised 12 principles for constructing multimedia learning experiences, which were proven to engage distance learners, based on the Equivalency Theory. All 12 principles were founded on evidence-based research to substantiate specific techniques unique for engaging distance learners and ensuring cognition. Years of evidence-based-research data have allowed instructional designers, like Mayer (2014), to build upon various concepts with real world applications.

 

Leveraging technology in past practice 

In the past, face-to-face lectures were recorded on DVD's, or audio cassettes and presented as "stand-alone" programs, or course modules. At that time, instructional designers believed that the same quality of educational instruction was being delivered to the learner. However, research has shown otherwise. Distance learning materials must be provided to the learner differently for better learning engagements and cognition, according to Dr. Simonson (Laureate Education, n.d.). Now, educators are constructing modules to fit the specific needs of the learner, which may or may not require recorded DVD's, or audio lectures.

 

Leveraging technology today

Today, RSS, podcasts, Amazon Audible e-books, YouTube, and Apps, stream pre-recorded videos and audio e-learning materials, like never before. However, many of these learning "tools" are provided as supplemental aids to enhance blended and distance learning curriculums, and not as "stand-alone" programs like in the past. Mayer’s principles, derived from the Equivalency Theory, are used to create learner centered modules. These principles insure successful learning transfer of distance learning instruction to the learner, by leveraging technology. To the instructional designer, there is nothing more important than successful learning transfer of distance learning instruction to the learner byway of leveraging technology. Yet, the true relevance of technological use depends on “cost, the technological infrastructure of the organization, personal preference,” (Fenton, 2018) and the ability to effectively leverage technology to produce positive distance learning outcomes.

EXAMPLE: Project Assessment Template (Laureate Education, n.d.)

 

Project Background Information:

  • Provide background information and describe the scenario, time frame,  surrounding the project.

  • State the stakeholder issues and identify any prevailing events, time frames, costs, resources, and limitations affecting the project assessment.

 

Brief Solution Description:

  • Visualize the problem scope adequately enough to make reasonable, educationally-sound assumptions to build a project design upon.

 

Situation Analysis:

  • What is the instructional problem your solution will address?

  • What is the nature of the content for your solution, and how much of the content will be delivered online?

  • What is the best distance learning model for delivering your proposed solution?

  • What technology tools (devices, apps, software, etc.) will the learner need to engage and how will they be used?

  • What other important learning environment or contextual factors need to be planned for?

 

Learner Analysis:

  • Who are the primary learners? Are there other potential learners involved?

  • What learning-related considerations will you need to make regarding gender, age, workplace experience, education, ethnicity, and potential disabilities?

  • What might be reasonable assumptions about entry competencies and prior knowledge?

  • What might be reasonable assumptions about learner attitudes toward the proposed solution?

  • What other considerations regarding learner needs and attributes should you consider?

 

Working Theory:

  • How much structure will be necessary? Are the learners fully self-reliant (autonomous) or will they need step-by-step guidance (course structure)?

  • What types of resources (money, SME, talent, instructor training, licensing, infrastructure, etc.) will be necessary to implement the solution?

  • What are the facilitator’s familiarity with technology, teaching experiences related to the audience, skill level with the content, instructional style, and administrative demands?

  • What are the considerations for fitting the distance learning model for delivering the solution to the environment of the learners?

  • Which of the course theories do you plan to apply?


 

References:

 

Fenton, C. (2018). Week-2 discussion correspondence for EDUC6135-2. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Education, Walden University, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Laureate Education (Producer). (n.d.). Theory and distance learning [Video file]. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu

 

Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing knowledge. Self-published with Creative Commons license. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/KnowingKnowledge_LowRes.pdf

 

Vai, M. & Sosulski, K.  (2016). Essentials of online course design: A standards-based guide, 2nd edition. New York, NY: Routledge

 

Mayer, R. E. (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: University of Cambridge.

2018 by BettyannRogers. Proudly created with Wix.com

© Copyright
bottom of page